Unemployment
Rates Historical Comparison East VS. West
Last week
we looked at poverty and the middle-class, and how they relate to Canadians.
Now we are going to take a look at a subject that ties in these previous
articles. Unemployment directly affects poverty and homelessness. In Canada,
our governments could be doing much more to help this problem, federal,
provincial, and municipal. Before getting into solutions, taking a look at the
facts and stats around unemployment in Canada is necessary.
Tradingeconimcs.com
has some really great information in regards to this subject. They describe the
unemployment rates as the “number of people actively looking for a job as a
percentage of the labour force.” In other words, this means that it is measuring
the amount of people who are able to work, who are of age, and yet are
unemployed, in Canada this includes 15 year-olds. Most recently October 2019,
showed Canadian unemployment rates at 5.5% which has been fairly consistent
since July bouncing between 5.5% and 5.7%. Canada did see a loss of 1, 800 full
time positions, but then replaced those with 14,300 part time jobs. Which is a
trend happening around the world, replacing full time jobs with part time jobs.
This means that more people have jobs, leading to lower unemployment rates, but
leading to lower paying jobs, meaning more poverty, or struggling families.
Since 1966 Canada has averaged an unemployment rate of 7.62%. In December 1982
this was at its highest rate of 13.10%, which was due to policies and economic
decisions made in the United States. The lowest rate recorded falls in at 2.90%
in June of 1966. Which means our current rates are below average, but it does
vary across the country and across job sectors. Canada saw drops in the
manufacturing, warehousing, construction, and transportation areas, but a
significant increase in administrative, finance, insurance, real estate,
rental, leasing, and agricultural employment. We also saw differences based
upon age, ages 15-24 saw no changes, but 24-55 year-old workers dropped in
employment, while those aged 55 and over increased in employment. Not quite the
shift I expected, but considering the manual labour job loss, it should not
come as a real surprise.
If we
look at Stats Canada, we can see how these rates are dependant upon the
province and territory one lives in. As of the summer the stats were as
follows, nationally 5.7% was the average. The provincial breakdown: BC 4.3%,
Alberta, 6.7 %, Saskatchewan 5.2%, Manitoba 5%, Ontario, 5.2%, Quebec 5%, New
Brunswick 7.2%, PEI 9%, Nova Scotia 6.5%, Newfoundland and Labrador 12.4%.
These numbers vary depending on how diversified each province is in their
economy. Maritime provinces tend to rely on many seasonal jobs, and so they end
up with higher rates depending on the season, otherwise many will leave for
other provinces to work in the off-season. In the territories we see Yukon with
2.7%, NWT with 7.3%, and Nunavut with 14.1%. Yukon has more Ocean access and
the ability to help in BC with forestry/fishery jobs, whereas NWT and Nunavut
do not have these options, and are far more spread out in population bases,
increasing the unemployment numbers. A good way around this issue, is for
provinces and territories to diversify their economies, so when one commodity
crashes, they have others to fall back on. Compared to other developed
countries, Canada ranks middle of the pack in unemployment rate success.
Switzerland leads the pack with 2.2% unemployment, and South Africa comes in at
the bottom with 29.1%, which also reflects poverty rates in these
countries.
If we
then take a closer look at the situation with the territories,
conferenceboard.ca has great reasoning behind their issue. They claim to have 2
factors behind the higher than national average unemployment rates. One is that
southern workers travel up north to take the higher-paying jobs that take more
skill, but they do not stay to live there. The same problem the west sees with
workers from the Maritimes. The second comes in the form of “economic expansion”,
this has pushed more people from the north to search for jobs, but not all will
be able to locate a job, resulting in more unemployment. Yukon, thankfully has
avoided these issues, maintaining one of the lowest unemployment rates in
Canada.
They do also
provide information on how unemployment rates can vary depending on immigration
status. In 2018, those born in Canada had a 5.2% unemployment rate, newly
landed immigrants were at 6.1%, immigrants landed less than 5 years were at
9.4%, immigrants landed within 5-10 years were at 6.4%, and Immigrants who have
lived here for more than 10 years were sitting at 5.3%. I do have an issue with
these stats though. First of all, immigrants who come to Canada need to be able
to support themselves and not rely on tax pay dollars to keep them afloat,
these numbers simply raise our countries unemployment stats. Secondly, if they
cannot maintain a job in Canada, then they should not be allowed to remain in
Canada. We have a lot of homelessness and poverty in Canada, so returning
people who are not working back home help us to support those who truly need
the help and are Canadians. This would apply for anyone who does not have a
citizenship.
During
Stephen Harper’s time as Prime Minister the country did fairly well economically,
with the exception of the 2008-09 recession, in which Canada was hit less hard
than the United States. Our unemployment rate hit 8.3% but since we seemed
better prepared, Canada was able to not be struck as hard as the United States,
who were bleeding jobs up to a total of 2.6 million jobs, according to CNN
Money. Too many lost jobs in both countries, but Canada’s preparation helped
the country to rebound quicker and to help other countries try to rebound.
However long term the US has been able to recover to lower unemployment rates,
having the US rates drop to as low as 4.9%. Canada was able to recover in a
short amount of time after this, mainly due to the quick thinking of Stephen
Harper, who was able to get a trade deal with China, which shortened the
recovery period, although some might say China is a terrible partner to
support. Then when moved forward to 2016, when Justin Trudeau was in his second
year as Prime Minister, rates dropped again, which has a lot to do with failed
promises, harmful bills, and failed projects. One such failure would be the
$4.5 billion purchase of the Kinder Morgan pipeline, which then got sidelined
by the Vancouver area blocked it from going through and had it upheld by the
Supreme Court of Canada (Huffington Post) Another threat would come in the form
of Bill C-69, which makes a lot more red-tape in place for any future
pipelines; it has been deemed the “Pipeline Killer”, according to Global News.
The purchase and failure to proceed as planned with the pipeline to the BC
coast, and a bill making it difficult to complete oil projects, made it very
tough for the West and cost many jobs and a lot of money. Atlantic jobs were
affected by this as well. Another factor in this was a struggle to recover
after the oil price crashed in 2014, which has taken years to try to rebound
from, a struggle that still shows today, hindered further by Federal
environmental laws. To further read into this, check out
conferenceboard.ca.
Unemployment
rates due to economic crashes, like in Alberta, can cause a spike in poverty
and homelessness rates, which we have seen in the west. I won’t get too far
into this topic though, as I have a whole previous article dedicated to that, (https://authortonypeters.blogspot.com/2019/11/keep-foreign-aid-money-in-canada.html and https://authortonypeters.blogspot.com/2019/11/trudeau-considering-supplying-vancouver.html). I will
say that in 2017 Stats Canada placed 3.4 million or 9.5% of Canadians below the
poverty line, which is not very clear, but they say the line is $25,000/year
for single adults, but $40,000 for families, which seems low to me. Wages tend
to play a big role in this, especially since so many people are having to work
2 jobs to make a living. The part time job trend has made this more pronounced.
The wage of an average Canadian is $25.55, but this can be a hard stat to set
with Salaries, self-employment, farming, and contract work.
When
looking to set up a policy around employment, a lot of factors must be
considered, as there will always be some unemployment, largely in part to
people moving to find jobs, shifting between workplaces, or a change in career.
Canadians tend to have the highest rates of moving between cities and provinces
to move to a labour mobility, according to conferenceboard.ca. The goal that
should be kept in mind for policy setting, is to motivate all eligible workers
in Canada to be able to find a job, no matter where in the country they are
located. When families and locations have longer periods of unemployment it
destroys and tears apart families and communities, so these periods need to be
acted upon quickly. This has been the situation in the west and Prime Minister
Trudeau has not followed through on promises to help the west fix this problem.
The west supplied thousands of jobs for eastern workers in their oil boom, but
when government policy destroyed this market the easterners flooded back east,
an option that westerners are left without. CBC estimated these workers as
being 20%, or 1700 people up to 10,000 at one point. Yet the east has
then criticized and hindered their progress to try to recover and diversify.
Another factor that could be looked at is technology. When new tech hits the
market it often cuts out jobs, leading to a spike in unemployment, but as
people receive training for the new tech, the rates drop, as people get jobs
working with the new technology. This creates short-term unemployment spikes,
followed by longer term employment spikes. There are times, however, when new
tech actually destroys a sector and takes it over, resulting in devastating job
loss rates, that will struggle to recoup, so when implementing new technology,
caution must be exercised to avoid unemployment because of technological
automation.
When an
area has low unemployment rates, employers will struggle to find employees and
wages are going to be higher, making it harder for employers to get by. High
wages can also boom the housing market, making it harder to buy a home due to
the inflation. Can areas really control this though? On one hand they could,
but should they? A boom does have to end at some point, often times with a
crash, rather than the preferred gradual decline. Which is devastating; but
being able to provide jobs for a long period of time is important, meaning that
preventing the boom is counter-productive. The best way to deal with the
situation, is to diversify, find ways of bringing in other economic
opportunities while the boom is on, that way when a crash does happen, the area
has other sectors to depend on. Not everything is within a community or countries
control however, a lot of this results from global and neighbouring countries
globalization. American decisions affect our country greatly, and more
recently, the decisions of the globe’s environmentally brain-washed
movement.
History
tells of mistakes made in this regard, but also tells of successes. Provides
educational opportunities in what not to do, as well as what to do. Listening
to these lessons, can guide Canada through economic struggle, to help make
Canada prosperous again. This does require governments that will listen. Our
government cares not what happens in the west, which has made recovery, which
the west is working at on their own, more challenging. All levels of government
should assist areas that are struggling, not ignoring one half of the country
and helping one province that has had it’s struggles. The whole country needs
to be economically stable to lower unemployment rates and the rates of poverty.
If we continue to have governments that ignore this, Canada will be led into
further disaster. Work together to come up with a solution for the country as a
whole. United we stand. Unify the West.
Written in collaboration with Spencer MathewsUnify The West Server https://discord.gg/rBKxjD3
Unify The West Facebook https://www.facebook.com/groups/443787693008469/
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave your comments below. I would love to hear your opinion on my posts!